Petitions seeking quashing of FIR No.252/2018, Police Station Chirawa, were rendered infructuous because the investigating agency filed a negative final report (Adam Vaku) on 01.07.2020 after investigation, holding the matter civil in nature.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:33451]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 980/2020
Ajay Kumar Adukia S/o Shri Mahaveer Prasad Adhukia, R/o 143, Anand Bhawan Jamnadas Adukia Marg, Kandivali (West), Mumbai.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 291/2020
Anjana Sharma W/o Ram Gopal Sharma, R/o B-122, Bhabha Marg, Tilak Nagar, Jaipur, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Saddik Khan, Adv. in S.B. Criminal |
|---|---|
| Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 980/2020 | |
| None in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous | |
| (Petition) No. 291/2020 | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Mahendra Meena, PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
06/08/2024
Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the factual report, from which it is clear that after completing investigation, the
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:33451]
[CRLMP-980/2020]
Investigating Officer has submitted negative final report before the Court concerned on 01.07.2020 as Adam Vaku on the ground that case pertains to civil in nature.
In this view of the matters, these Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions for quashing the FIR No.252/2018 registered at Police Station Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu have been rendered infructuous.
They are accordingly disposed of.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Jatin /135-136
Ajay Kumar Adukia
Anjana Sharma
State Of Rajasthan
Anil Kumar
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
