The petitioner challenged the order of cognizance framing charges. Since the trial culminated during the petition's pendency, the High Court disposed of the misc. petition and all pending stay applications without substantive adjudication on the challenge.
Petition and pending stay applications disposed of due to termination of trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:10719]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6740/2015
Archana Bhargav W/o Shri Dheeraj Bhargav, R/o Suket Tehsil Ramganjmandi, District Kota (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Parth Sharma for Mr. Sudhir Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Meena, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
01/03/2024
disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
Pcg/Grv/70
Archana Bhargav
State Of Rajasthan
Sudes Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
