Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging dismissal of a Section 437(5) application and concurrent orders in a criminal case; petitioner sought withdrawal on instructions and the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, disposing of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:10770]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1080/2011
Nemi Chand Jain S/o Late Shri Mool Chand Ji Jain, R/o 202, Upasna Apartment, E-14, Bihari Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
and both non-petitioners 2 & 3 having office at M/S Bajaj Healthcare Ltd. 202-204, Faize-E-Qutbi, 375 NarsiNatha Street, Mumbai-400009 P.S. Pydhunie, Mumbai-400003
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. |
Sahil Duseja for |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. | Dinesh Kala | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
Atul Sharma, PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
01/03/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:10770]
[CRLMP-1080/2011]
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
SOURAV /490
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Nemi Chand Jain
The State Of Rajasthan
Shri Anil Jain
Shri Sajan Kumar Bajaj
Sudesh Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
