The High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition challenging the dismissal of an application to drop a complaint under Section 138 NI Act. The court held that the lower courts acted within jurisdiction and the petitioner could raise objections during final arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:5948]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6559/2015
Ganesh Sharma S/o Shri Birdi Chand Sharma, resident of Chanakya Marg, House No.1289, Subhash Chowk, Jaipur Metropolitan Jaipur (Raj)
---Accused-Petitioner
Versus
Non-petitioner
----Complainant-Non-petitioner
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Atul Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order
05/02/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JP:5948]
[CRLMP-6559/2015]
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
TN/21
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the dismissal of the petitioner's application to dismiss the complaint under Section 138(B) NI Act at the final hearing stage.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Ganesh Sharma
State Of Rajasthan
Rampal Pareek
SUDESH BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
