High Court dismissed a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging an order quashing cognizance in a rape case. The lower court allowed time for DNA testing. HC found no miscarriage of justice in the lower court's order.
Petition dismissed; lower order quashing cognizance stands upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:8125]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6348/2015
Kamlesh W/o Sh. Rameshwar B/c Jat, R/o Village Jatoli Thun, Police Station Deeg, District Bharatpur, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
16/02/2024
(2 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:8125]
[CRLMP-6348/2015]
“अतः निगरािी स्ीकार ककी जाती हह ऍफ़ आर. अस्ीकार ककी जाती हह ललनकि यह निर्देश नर्यल जातल हह नक पीनडिता कल कपड़ड़ो पर पायल गयल माि् ्ीयर का डिी०एि०ए० परी्ቌण कराया जा्ल । च चनक उसका नमलाि अनअभड़ोगी निगरािीकार कल डिी. एि. ए. सल कराया जािा हह अतः नििा नगरफतारी कल निगरािीकार डिी०एि०ए० परी्ቌण कल नलए िम िा नर्यल गयल कल नलए अिुसंभाि अनभकारी कल सम्ቌ उपनसቝኌत हड़ो । साቝኌ ही पीनडिता कल कपड़ड़ो ककी जांच िाित भी करायी जायल नक कया उि पर उस खलत ककी नमटटी अቝኌ्ा ् सरसड़ो कल पड़ोभड़ो कल अंश हह। अनभयु्ሹ दारा अिुपनसቝኌनत ् अሺैय सቝኌाि पर हड़ोिल कल अनि्ाश कल िारल म भी न्सत्त अिुसंभाि नकया जायल ।"
(3 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:8125]
[CRLMP-6348/2015]
order with certain directions to be carried out before considering the issue of cognizance, moreso in the backdrop of facts, where the husband of prosecutrix is already facing criminal prosecution under Section 302 IPC and the non-petitioner-accused happens to be the witness in that criminal case.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
SOURAV /36
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the impugned order that quashed cognizance under Section 376 IPC allowing time for DNA testing and investigation.
Whether the impugned order below resulted in a miscarriage of justice or abuse of process of law.
Whether the accused was a witness in the husband's prosecution making the FIR a pressure tactic.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kamlesh W/o Sh. Rameshwar
State Of Rajasthan
Chandan S/o Sh. Nekram
Sudes Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
