Petition to quash an FIR for offences including cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy on the basis of a private compromise. Relying on Supreme Court authority permitting quashing of non-compoundable offences where parties settle, the court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR and consequential proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:39888]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4723/2024
Naval Dwivedi S/o Ramsharan Dwivedi, R/o Barnala Tehsil Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anoop Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Sohan Lal Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
20/09/2024
(2 of 3) [CRLMP-4723/2024]
[2024:RJ-JP:39888]
been passed qua the offences under sections 467,468, 471 and 120B of IPC.
[2024:RJ-JP:39888] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-4723/2024]
(SAMEER JAIN),J
Neeru/5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR for non-compoundable offences can be quashed on basis of compromise between parties under inherent powers.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh Vs. State of PunjabRelied on¶4
(2012) 10 SCC 303 · Who else cites this
Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya PradeshRelied on¶4
2022 (14) SCC 531 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Naval Dwivedi
State Of Rajasthan
Ms. Pulkit
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
