Prashant Jat Son of Ramsahay Jat, Vs State of Rajasthan

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that merely on account of lapse and negligence on the part of concerned advocate qua non-representation before the concerned Court, the case of the petitioner should not be prejudiced.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and averments made by the learned counsel for the petitiner, this Court deems it fit to set aside the order dated 09.07.2024 in light of the following directions.

¶16

This Court grants liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate detailed application qua condonation of delay within a period of fortnight and the same be considered by the learned Trial Court within a period of 15 days, strictly in accordance with

[2024:RJ-JP:39648]

[CRLMP-5979/2024]

(2 of 2)

law, without being prejudiced by the impugned order, subject to deposition of a cost of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand only) with the RALSA Authorities of the concerned Additional Sessions Judge, Gangapur City, Sawaimadhopur.

¶21

Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

¶22

(SAMEER JAIN),J

¶23

ANIL SHARMA /44

Prashant Jat Son of Ramsahay Jat, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prashant Jat Son of Ramsahay Jat, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Isrial Vs State

Bachchu Son of Unknown Vs State of Rajasthan

Amandeep Tarad S/O Shri Om Prakash Tarad, Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul @ Sanjay S/O Babulal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Babulal Sharma S/O Badrinarayan Sharma, Vs State of Rajasthan

Babulal Sharma S/O Badrinarayan Sharma, Vs State of Rajasthan