Held that an interpleader application was allowed, rendering the criminal miscellaneous petition infructuous, which was subsequently dismissed. No detailed reasoning provided in the brief order text provided.
The interpleader application was allowed; the criminal miscellaneous petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:37222]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4663/2015
Amitabh Vijay Son of Shri Gankesh Bairwa, aged about 51 years, Resident of B-63, Sikar House, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
(The name and address of the petitioner is intentionally and malafidly mentioned in the Complaint filed by complainant as Naresh Bairwa @ Amitabh Vijay Gautam R/o 563, Sikar House, Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
(The Name of Caste of the Complainant has been intentionally and malafidly mentioned in the complaint as Usha Yadav @ Vibhuti Vijay Gautam)
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, Dy. GA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
04/09/2024
Matter comes up on an application (I.A. No.1/2023).
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed.
Therefore, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Jatin /265
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal miscellaneous petition becomes infructuous upon allowance of the interpleader application.
Amitabh Vijay
State Of Rajasthan
Smt. Vibhuti Vijay
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
