Munni Devi v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
Special Bench in Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur entered the petitioner's S.B. Criminal Miscellate Petition. The petitioner sought quashing of an FIR alleging cognizance of matter arising out of a private dispute. The bench considered the proposal for quashing and analyzed its relevance to the cited Section 220 BNSS.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JD:1208]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 390/2022
Munni Devi W/o Buddha Ram, Aged About 40 Years, B/c Jat, R/o Plot No. 110, Parshwanath Nagar, Bhadwasiya, Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
- State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. The Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionarate, Jodhpur.
- The Station House Officer Of Police Station Mahamandir, Jodhpur City East, Jodhpur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Judgment
09/01/2024
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to quash the FIR under Section 220 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, given the circumstances of the case.
What constitutes a private dispute that may be quashed in criminal proceedings pending in the 3rd Judicial Zone of Rajasthan.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Munni Devi W/o Buddha Ram
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
- respondent
The Commissioner Of Police
- respondent
The Station House Officer Of Police Station Mahamandir
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMP/390/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court