Allowed

Raju Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Jan 2024CRLMB/15352/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a Regular Bail Application under CrPC Section 267/2023 and BNS Section 8/21. The Hon'ble Single Judge granted bail to the petitioner, highlighting his failure to appear for previous bail hearings and lack of family members to provide surety, yet exercising judicial discretion to release him due to the significance of the offenses.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's Bail Application allowed; Participant released on bail.

Raju Ram Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:1145]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15352/2023

¶4

Raju Ram S/o Ameda Ram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Juna Lakhvara Tehsil Chohtan Dist. Barmer (At Present Lodged In Dist. Jail, Barmer)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Jitendra Ojha
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. M.S. Bhati,PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Order

¶11

09/01/2024

¶12

01izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls tekur dk ;g vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk] iqfyl Fkkuk pkSgVu] ftyk ckM+esj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 267@2023] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@21 ,u-Mh-ih-,l- ,DV ds ekeys esa tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk izLrqr gqvk gSA

¶13

02cgl tekur vkosnu lquh rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶14

03izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk dh vksj ls ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks bl izdj.k esa >wBk Qalk;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls cjkenlqnk eknd inkFkZ Lesd okf.kfT;d ek=k ls de dk gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dkQh le; ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gSA izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gS rFkk iwoZ esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ,d ,u-Mh-ih-,l- ,DV dk eqdnek vo'; Fkk] ijarq mlesa Hkh pkyku is'k gks pqdk gSA vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA nkSjkus cgl izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk us pkyku dh izfr U;k;ky; ds voyksdu gsrq izLrqr dh] ftls 'kkfey i=koyh fd;k tkrk gSA

[2024:RJ-JD:1145]

[CRLMB-15352/2023]

(2 of 2)

04blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us mDr tekur vkosnu i= dk l[r fojks/k djrs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds tekur vkosnu i= dks [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶19

05eSaus mi;qZDr rdkZsa ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶20

06cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] izdj.k esa pkyku is'k gks tkus ls o izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls cjken eknd inkFkZ okf.kfT;d ek=k ls de gksus ls izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izdj.k ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶21

07ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr jktqjke iq= vesnkjke iqfyl Fkkuk pkSgVu] ftyk ckM+esj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 267@2023 ds ekeys esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa viuh fu;fer mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur izLrqr dj rLnhd djk ns rks mls bl izdj.k esa tekur ij rqjar fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶22

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶23

76-mayank/-

Raju Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagwanram Prajapat Vs State of Rajasthan

Mani Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ishwar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashok Kumar Vs Ladu Ram

Yusuf Khan @ Tuti Vs State of Rajasthan

Sri Ram Vs State of Rajasthan