The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking fair investigation, ruling that the prayer was infructuous since a negative final report had already been submitted to the concerned court.
No relief was granted; the petition stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:25684]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3826/2022
Smt. Saroj Devi, Aged About 40 Years, W/o Shri Krishan Kumar Aged About 40 Years, R/o Ward No. 28 Chirwa, District Jhunjhunu, Raj
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Mahala, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
29/05/2024
No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner to argue the case.
The instant petition under Section 482 has been filed for seeking direction to the Investigating Agency for conducting fair, proper, impartial and expedite investigation.
Learned Public Prosecutor places on record factual report dated 29.05.2024. According to the factual report, negative final report has already been submitted in the court concerned on 27.03.2023.
In view of the above factual position, prayer made in this petition does not survive any more.
[2024:RJ-JP:25684]
[CRLMP-3826/2022]
(2 of 2)
Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition as well as pending application(s), if any, stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J
DEEPA RANI -241
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for directions to Investigating Agency survives given the submission of a negative final report.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Saroj Devi
State of Rajasthan
Anil Kumar Upan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
