Criminal miscellaneous petition dismissed for want of prosecution as petitioners did not appear to argue the case even in second round and appeared to have lost interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:25454]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3545/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order
28/05/2024
No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners to argue the case even in second round.
Perhaps, petitioners have lost interest in this petition.
Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition as well as pending application(s), if any, stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J
LALIT MOHAN /287
Sulatan
Hanuman
Ramu @ Ramesh
Prahlad
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
Secretary, Baba R.n. Gaur Grah Nirman Sahakari Samiti Limited, Jaipur (Raj)
Anil Kumar Upman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
