The petitioners sought quashing of an FIR for offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC. The court noted that a charge-sheet had been filed in the competent court, rendering the petitions infructuous. The petitions were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:33905]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 6105/2023
Yuvraj Varma S/o Shri Harish Kumar Varma, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Haridular, Bungalow No.118, Jankidevi School Road, SVP Nagar, 4 Bungalow, Andheri West, Mumbai, Maharashtra.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 3441/2023
Sunil Bumb S/o Shri Trilokchand Bumb, Aged About 49 Years, R/o 34 A, Main Sector, Shastri Nagar, Bhilwara (Raj.).
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Nonepresent |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Arun Kumar,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI
Order
14/08/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JD:33905]
[CRLMP-6105/2023]
Misc. Petitions seeking quashing of FIR in question have been rendered infructuous.
(RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J
205-206-suraj/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the quashing of FIR should be granted after charge-sheet has been filed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Yuvraj Varma
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
Goapl Samdani
Sunil Bumb
Gopal Samdani
Rajendra Prakash Soni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
