Allowed

Prabhu Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Aug 2024CRLMB/6373/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed bail applications filed by three accused persons charged with offences under IPC Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, and 307. The court granted bail subject to furnishing personal and surety bonds and providing bank account details.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail with personal and two surety bonds, provision of bank details via affidavit, and submission of Aadhar and bank passbook copies.

Prabhu Ram Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:33900]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6373/2024

¶4

Prabhu Ram S/o Shri Okha Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Dugawa, P.S. Sanchore, District Sanchore (Presently Lodged In District Jail, Sanchore)

¶5

Deva Ram S/o Shri Okha Ram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Dugawa, P.S. Sanchore, District Sanchore (Presently Lodged In District Jail, Sanchore)

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6220/2024 Vardha Ram S/o Aokha Ram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Dugava, P.S. Sanchore, District Sanchore. (Presently Lodged At District Jail, Sanchore)

¶12

----Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Suresh Kumbhat
	Mr. Jagdish Kumar Vishnoi
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Arun Kumar, PP with
	Mr. C.P. Marwan

¶17

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI

¶18

Order

¶19

14/08/2024

¶20

Arrested in furtherance of FIR No.115/2024, registered at Police Station Sanchore, District Sanchore, petitioners have filed these applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for releasing them on

[2024:RJ-JD:33900]

[CRLMB-6373/2024]

(2 of 3)

bail. The petitioners are charged for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326 and 307 of the I.P.C.

¶25

Heard arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, learned public prosecutor and carefully perused the entire material available on record. 3. I have given my anxious consideration to the rival submissions with reference to material placed before me. 4. On perusal of the record and upon consideration of the submissions, it would be prmia-facie clear that after investigation charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter. Admittedly, the incident took place upon the land of the petitioners. Both the parties has lodged cross-cases. Mother of both the complainant and petitioner has stated that both the parties assaulted upon each other and caused the injury.

¶26

Having considered the material available on record; the arguments advanced by counsel for the petitioners particularly the facts narrated above and the fact that bail rejection order goes to show that petitioners are not involved in any other case; that trial is likely to take its own considerable time and taking note of all these aspects I do not intend to go into the merits of the matter but of the considered view that the petitioners have available to them substantial grounds so as to question the prosecution case and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in detention for an indefinite period therefore, I am inclined to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioners at this stage.

¶27

Consequently, the present bail applications are allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioners 1. Prabhu Ram S/o Shri Okha Ram, 2. Deva Ram S/o Shri Okha Ram and 3. Vardha

[2024:RJ-JD:33900]

[CRLMB-6373/2024]

(3 of 3)

Ram S/o Aokha Ram , arrested in connection with the F.I.R. No.115/2024, registered at Police Station Sanchore, District Sanchore shall be released on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond and two surety bonds of sufficient amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. This order is subject to the condition that accused, within 7 days of their release, and sureties on the day of furnishing bail, will also furnish details of their all bank accounts, with bank and branch name, in shape of an affidavit, and submit legible copy of their Aadhar cards as well as copy of front page of Bank pass book, for smooth recovery of penalty amount, if there arise a need for recovery of penalty under Section 446 Cr.P.C in future.

¶32

(RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J

¶33

38-39-suraj/-

Prabhu Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhu Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Santosh Kumar Joshi Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravindra Kumar @ Parvindra Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Tara and Ors. Vs Shanker Sharan and Ors.

Vardha Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunil Bumb Vs State of Rajasthan