Petitioner's S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as counsel could not even show instructions in the matter on the date of hearing.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:33402]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2932/2017
Ramjilal Agarwal S/o Late Shri Suwalal Agarwal, A-02, Shanti Nagar, In Front Of N.b.c. Jaipur, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Joshi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahendra Meena, PP Ms. Rakhi Singh for Mr. D N Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
06/08/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instructions in
the matter.
So, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Tahir/59
Ramjilal Agarwal
State Of Rajasthan
Smt. Raj Kanwar
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
