The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition. The court accepted that the underlying complaint case under Section 138 of the NI Act had been culminated and the accused acquitted due to a compromise, rendering the petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:24277]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 169/2017
Jitendra Singh S/o Shri Kartar Singh, R/o House No. 68, Balaji Vihar 25 Vistar, Behind Balaji College Bainad Road, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Namonarayan Meena for Mr. Harendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahendra Meena, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
21/05/2024
As per letter dated 21.05.2024 received from learned Additional Civil Judge and Metropolitan Magistrate No.9, Jaipur Metropolitan-II, the proceedings of complaint case No.143/2010 (Regular Criminal Case No.936/2010) under Section 138 of NI Act has been culminated and the accused has been acquitted in the said case on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. The same is taken on record.
Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition as well as pending application(s), if any, stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J
DEEPA RANI -84
Jitendra Singh
State of Rajasthan
Anil
Anil Kumar Upmann
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
