Petition seeking quashing of an FIR for offences under Sections 336 and 509 IPC. Charge-sheet had already been filed and trial was ongoing; the case did not fit the Bhajan Lal guidelines. The High Court dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:24441]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 146/2021
Lalit Kumar Singh S/o Late Shri Anand Singh, Resident Of B-26, Singh Bhoomi, Khatipura, Police Station, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur West.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahendra Meena, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
21/05/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:24441]
[CRLMP-146/2021]
(2 of 2)
present petitioner does not cover the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [ AIR 1992 SC 604 ],
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J
LALIT MOHAN /99
1 issue framed by the court
Should FIR No. 206/2020 under Sections 336 and 509 IPC be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors.Referred
AIR 1992 SC 604 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Lalit Kumar Singh
State Of Rajasthan
Rakhi Kaushik
Anil Kumar Upman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
