Learned counsel for the petitioners at the outset submitted that the controversy involved in the instant criminal misc. petitions has already been set at rest by the coordinate Benches of this Court in the case of Ashok Kumar Jain Vs. State of Rajasthan reported in 2019(2) CJ(Cri) Raj. 803, Bano Vs. State of Rajasthan reported in 2019(2) CrLR (Raj.) 997, Prathvi Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (S.B.Cr.Misc. Petition No.661/2016) and Smt.Kamla Vs. State of Rajasthan (S.B.Cr. Misc. Petition No.1164/2016) wherein it has been held that even if the allegations of the complainant are accepted to be true, then also the offence which at best can be said to be committed by the accused, would be of making false statement in connection with an election which is punishable under Section 171-G IPC or furnishing false information to any public servant punishable under Section 177 IPC or the offences punishable under Sections 181, 193, 199 and 200 IPC; and all these offences are non-cognizable offences. As per the provisions of sub-section (2) of Section 155 Cr.P.C., a Police officer cannot investigate into the allegations of non-cognizable offence without any order of Magistrate having power to try such case or commit such case for trial.