Dismissed

Babu Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Jan 2024CRLMP/131/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought that their names were omitted from the FIR and they were not involved in the offence. Petition was not pressed in court. They were given liberty to submit a representation to the Superintendent of Police, who must decide within 30 days. Pending decision, arrest is stayed.

What did the court decide?

Stay on arrest pending decision of representation by Superintendent of Police within 30 days; liberty to file representation.

Babu Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:2902]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 131/2024

¶4

Babu Singh S/o Shri Arjun Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Rajputo Ka Bas, Digari Kallan District Jodhpur.

¶5

Sher Singh S/o Shri Arjun Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/ o Rajputo Ka Bas, Digari Kallan District Jodhpur.

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

Dilip Singh S/o Mahendra Singh, R/o Village Ujaliya, P.s. Karwar, District Jodhpur. At Present 10/31 Defence Colony, Roopnagar, Nandri, Jodhpur.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Sharma, PP

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

¶13

Order

¶14

17/01/2024

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the names of the petitioner do not find place in the FIR and they have nothing to do with the alleged offence, however, at this stage learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the instant criminal misc. petition. However, he seeks liberty for the petitioner to submit a representation to the Superintendent of Police- Banar with appropriate directions to decide the same and issue necessary instructions to the concerned Investigating Officer.

¶16

Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition as well as stay petition are dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to submit a detailed representation to the concerned

[2024:RJ-JD:2902]

[CRLMP-131/2024]

(2 of 2)

Superintendent of Police averring therein all the grounds which have been raised in this petition within a period of 20 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

In the event, the representation is submitted, the concerned Superintendent of Police is directed to minutely and objectively consider the contents of the same and thereafter, issue necessary instructions to the Investigating Officer. All the relevant documents with the representation shall also be taken into consideration. The representation shall be decided within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the same. Till the representation is decided, the petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with FIR No.332/2023 registered at the Police StationBanar, District- Jodhpur.

¶22

Needless to say that in the event, the grievance of the petitioner persists, he would be at liberty to approach this Court again.

¶23

(FARJAND ALI),J

¶24

217-arjun/-

Babu Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Babu Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kalu Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Prabhu Dayal Vs State of Rajasthan

Noshad Alam Vs Smt. Afsana Bano

Sohan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijay Choudhary Vs State of Rajasthan

Mobin Ali @ Kakku Vs State of Rajasthan