Bail application allowed where call data records contradicted the victim's allegations of abduction and rape, undermining the prosecution's case.
Acc petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:2459]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 132/2024
Noshad Alam S/o Samshu Miya, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Panki Tola Sunderi Bandh, P.s. Panki, Distt. Palamu (Jarkhand) At Present Shrinath Colony, Nathdwara, Rajsamand (Raj.) (Petitioner Is Lodged In Central Jail Udaipur).
----Petitioner
| Versus |
|---|
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. AnujSahlot |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Abhishek Purohit,AGA |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
16/01/2024
| S.No. | Particulars of t | he Case |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | FIR Number |
240/2023 |
| 2. | Concerned Police Station |
Savina |
| 3. | District |
Udaipur |
| 4. | Offences alleged in the FIR |
Section 376 of IPC |
| 5. | Offences added, if any |
Section 376 (2)(n), 366 & 343 of IPC |
| 6. | Date of passing of impugned order |
22.12.2023 |
(2 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JD:2459]
[CRLMB-132/2024]
(3 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JD:2459]
[CRLMB-132/2024]
bellied, it is deemed suitable to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner in the present matter.
(FARJAND ALI),J
90-Samvedana/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the allegations against the petitioner are supported by scientific evidence such that bail should be denied?
5 provisions across 2 enactments
Noshad Alam
Smt. Afsana Bano
State Of Rajasthan
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
