Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR after a compromise with the complainant. Relying on Gian Singh, invoking Section 482 CrPC inherent powers, the court quashed FIR No.0596/2023 for cheating/forgery offences.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:31919]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1102/2024
----Petitioners
| Versus |
|---|
| ----Respondents |
|---|
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. RS Choudhary |
|---|---|
| Mr. JK Suthar | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Arun Kumar, PP |
| Mr. BajrangSingh for Kaushal Gautam |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI
Order
01/08/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JD:31919]
[CRLMP-1102/2024]
10. Stay petition is also disposed of.
(RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J
216-Anshul/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR proceedings should be quashed in view of the compromise between the parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh V/s. State of Punjab & Anr.Applied
(2012) 10 SCC 303 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajshree
Pratima Kalia
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
Sampat Singh
Rajendra Prakash Soni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
