Dismissed

Sitaram S/O Shyoji v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Sept 2024CRLMB/9943/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan bench, noting that the accused members of the petitioning family participated in acts but failed to appear in court and have fled, held that the bail application is not maintainable under Section 482 CrPC as the High Court should not interfere to quash or stay proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Bail application dismissed; proceedings against the petitioners continued as per law.

Sitaram S/O Shyoji Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:39769]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9943/2024

¶4

Sitaram S/o Shyoji, Residing At Doi Ki Dhani, Datwas, Tehsil Niwai, District Tonk.

¶5

Kamal S/o Shyoji, Residing At Doi Ki Dhani, Datwas, Tehsil Niwai, District Tonk.

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pratush Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, P.P. Mr. Atar Singh

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶12

Order

¶13

19/09/2024

¶14

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k lhrkjke ,oa dey }kjk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad& 31-07-2024 ds fo:) ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 482 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk] mls iqfyl Fkkuk& nrokl] ftyk Vksad esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k &102@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 341] 323] 325] 307@34 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa vfxze tekur iznku fd;s tkus ds laca/k esa izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶15

cgl lquh xbZA

¶16

;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k dks bl izdj.k esa feF;k fyIr fd;k tk jgk gSA ifjoknh i{k vkijkf/kd izo`fRr ds yksx gSaA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls Hkh vyx&vyx Fkkus esa ifjoknh i{k ds fo:) ,Q0vkbZ0vkj0 ntZ djkbZ xbZ gSaA izkFkhZx.k ls vfHkj{kkRed vuqla/kku dh vko’;drk ugha gS] vr% izkFkhZx.k dks vfxze tekur ij NksMk tkosA

[2024:RJ-JP:39769]

[CRLMB-9943/2024]

(2 of 2)

;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd ,oa ifjoknh ds ;ksX; vf/kdkjh }kjk vfxze tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;kA mudk fuosnu gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa uketn gSaA os yxkrkj vuqla/kku ls Qjkj py jgs gSaA bl izdj.k dh ?kVuk esa et:c /kesZUnz dks dkQh pksVsa vkbZ gSa] og lkr fnu rd vLirky esa HkrhZ Hkh jgk gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr lhrkjke ds fo:) fxjQ~rkjh okj.V Hkh fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk tkjh fd;k gqvk gS rFkk iqfyl us izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr lhrkjke ds fo:) nks gtkj :i, dk buke Hkh tkjh fd;k gqvk gSA vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh }kjk izkFkhZ ds fo:) /kkjk 341] 323] 325 ,oa 307 Hkk0na0la0 dk vijk/k izekf.kr ik;k gS] vr% vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k tkosA

¶21

geus nksuksa i{kksa dh vksj ls izLrqr rdksZa] fordksZa ij euu fd;kA dslMk;jh dk voyksdu fd;kA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr lhrkjke ds fo:) fxjQ~rkjh okj.V tkjh gSA izkFkhZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa uketn gSA vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh }kjk ckn vuqla/kku izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) vijk/k izekf.kr ik;k gSA vuqla/kku i=koyh ij vU; lk{; Hkh miyC/k gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr eas ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk fd izkFkhZx.k dks izdj.k esa feF;k :i ls fyIr fd;k tk jgk gks rFkk uk gh ,slh dksbZ vkiokfnd ifjfLFkfr;ka gh fo|eku gSa ftlds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tk ldsA vr% nksuksa i{kksa ds vf/koDrkx.k }kjk j[ks x, rdkaZs ,oa izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDrx.k 1- lhrkjke iq= Jh ';ksth] 2- dey iq= Jh ';ksth dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu varxZr /kkjk 482 ch-,u-,l-,l- vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA

¶23

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶24

MANOJ ADWANI /397

Sitaram S/O Shyoji v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sitaram S/O Shyoji v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arun Kumar Meena S/O Shri Suaalal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhopal Singh Vs Koshlya Devi and Ors.

Jaid S/O Usman Vs State of Rajasthan

Arun Sharma S/O Shri Rajkumar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Rambabu S/O Sh. Shivkaran Vs State of Rajasthan

Hanuman Singh S/O Mangtu Ram Vs State of Rajasthan