The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed an anticipatory bail application filed by two accused persons charged under sections 143, 323, 341, 302, and 120-B IPC. The court declined bail, citing incomplete investigation and specific eyewitness allegations against the petitioners.
The application for anticipatory bail was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:40213]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8414/2024
----Petitioners
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, PP Mr. Iliyas Khan, for complainant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
21/09/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:40213]
[CRLMB-8414/2024]
(2 of 2)
about the cause of death of the deceased. He further submits that the accused petitioners are ready to cooperate with the investigation and no purpose will be served by sending them in custody.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /156
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to extend anticipatory bail to the accused petitioners in a murder case where investigation is incomplete.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kiran Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr.Referred¶21
Kiran Devi Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. (Criminal Appeal No. 61 of 1987)
Smt. Kesari Devi W/o Ramlal Yadav
Gaurav Yadav S/o Ramlal Yadav
State of Rajasthan
GANESH RAM MEENA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
