Bench allowed bail for two petitioners accused in an IPC property dispute case where no specific overt acts were assigned to them. The application for one petitioner was treated as withdrawn and dismissed.
Released on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- plus two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:38085]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
----Petitioners
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. N.S. Dhakad, Public Prosecutor |
| Mr. Vishal Gurjar for complainant |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order
09/09/2024
[CRLMB-7765/2024]
[2024:RJ-JP:38085]
(2 of 3)
dismissed as withdrawn.
(3 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:38085]
[CRLMB-7765/2024]
opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners Shaitan Gurjar S/o Shri Mewaram and Shivraj Gurjar S/o Shri Mewaram on bail.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
Satyendra/52
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to petitioners Shaitan Gurjar and Shivraj Gurjar considering the property dispute and lack of overt acts assigned to them?
Whether the application of Girdhari Gurjar is maintainable given the request to withdraw it?
Whether the injuries of the injured party mandate the denial of bail to other petitioners?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shaitan Gurjar
Girdhari Gurjar
Shivraj Gurjar
State of Rajasthan
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
