Allowed

Manjeet @ Khillu S/O Ramchandra v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC9 Feb 2024CRLMB/774/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-bench order grants bail to two petitioners, Subhash S/o Jagan and Manjeet @ Khillu, under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in FIR No.596/2024. The court discharged them on a bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each.

Manjeet @ Khillu S/O Ramchandra Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:6774]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

773/2024

¶5

Subhash S/o Jagan, R/o Tawran Ki Dhani, Tan Loyati, Police Station Bansur, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli- Behror. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Behror, District Kotputli-Behror).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶12

774/2024

¶13

Manjeet @ Khillu S/o Ramchandra, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Mothuka, Police Station Bansur, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli- Behror. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Behror, District KotputliBehror).

¶14

----Petitioner

¶15

Versus

¶16

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶17

----Respondent

¶18

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Yadav, Adv. For : Mr. Ghan Shyam Singh Respondent(s) Rathore, GA-cum-AAG, with Mr. Tejendra Pal Singh Rathore, Adv.

¶19

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶20

09/02/2024

¶21

[2024:RJ-JP:6774]

¶22

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-773/2024]

¶23

These bail applications have been filed by petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.596/2023 registered at Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror for the offence(s) under Section(s) 457 & 380 IPC.

¶24

Learned counsel for petitioners submits that accused-petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in these cases. He further submits that accused-petitioners have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶25

Learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General appearing for the State has opposed these bail applications.

¶26

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of these cases, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of these cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge petitioners on bail.

¶27

Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioners 1.Subhash S/o Jagan & 2.Manjeet @ Khillu S/o Ramchandra shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two

¶28

[2024:RJ-JP:6774] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-773/2024]

¶29

sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶30

A copy of this order be placed in connected file.

¶31

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶32

DANISH USMANI /11 & 12

Manjeet @ Khillu S/O Ramchandra v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manjeet @ Khillu S/O Ramchandra v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hirki and Ors. Vs State

Kalyan Singh and Ors. Vs State

Mahendra Kumar Prajapat S/O Lalaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Shankar Lal S/O Kalyan Vs State of Rajasthan

Narendra Kumar Rai S/O Sh. Ram Bilas Rai Vs Union of India

Subhash S/O Jagan Vs State of Rajasthan