Allowed

Mahendra Singh Solanki Son of Ramswaroop v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Jul 2024CRLMB/7557/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application in FIR No.161/2024 for offences under Sections 8/29 NDPS Act. The court noted the alleged contraband recovered was less than commercial quantity and, without commenting on merits, enlarged the accused on bail on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, to appear before the trial Court on all dates.

Mahendra Singh Solanki Son of Ramswaroop Vs State of… — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:27470]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

7557/2024

¶5

Mahendra Singh Solanki Son Of Ramswaroop, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Village Indrapura Police Station Sarwad, District Kekri (Raj) (At Present In Central Jail Ajmer)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Singh Shekhawat, Adv. & Mr. Prameshwar Pilania, Adv. For : Mr. N.S. Gurjar, PP Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order

¶12

02/07/2024

¶13

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.161/2024 registered at Police Station Kekri City, District Kekri for the offence(s) under Section(s) 8/29 of NDPS Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel

¶15

[2024:RJ-JP:27470]

¶16

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-7557/2024]

¶17

further submits that the alleged contraband recovered in the present case is less than commercial quantity. Learned counsel also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the recovery of alleged contraband in the present case is less than commercial quantity, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Mahendra Singh Solanki Son Of Ramswaroop shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before

¶21

[2024:RJ-JP:27470] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7557/2024]

¶22

that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶24

GAURAV SHARMA /630

Mahendra Singh Solanki Son of Ramswaroop v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahendra Singh Solanki Son of Ramswaroop v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murli Manohar Naamdev S/O Shri Badri Lal Naama Vs State of Rajasthan

Mangilal S/O Dalchand Vs State of Rajasthan

Suraj Mal S/O Rameshwar Vs State of Rajasthan

Shubham S/O Giriraj, Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra S/O Shri Devi Sahai Vs State of Rajasthan

Ravi S/O Ramsharan, Vs State of Rajasthan