Allowed

Mangilal S/O Dalchand v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC1 Jul 2024CRLMB/3875/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in an NDPS case involving recovery of contraband less than commercial quantity; charge sheet filed and petitioner in custody. Court granted bail on a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs.50,000 each, to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Mangilal S/O Dalchand Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:26944]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

3875/2024

¶5

Mangilal S/o Dalchand, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Chhipi Mohalla, Bandawadi Ka Bas, Baswa, Police Station Baswa, District Dausa. (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umesh Dixit, Adv. For : Mr. Riyasat Ali, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 01/07/2024

¶12

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.66/2024 registered at Police Station Baswa, District Dausa for the offence(s) under Section(s) 8/21 of NDPS Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that charge sheet has been filed and the alleged contraband recovered in the present case is less than commercial quantity. He also submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since

[2024:RJ-JP:26944]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-3875/2024]

long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that recovery of the alleged contraband in the present case is less than commercial quantity, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Mangilal S/o Dalchand shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶22

DANISH USMANI /16

Mangilal S/O Dalchand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mangilal S/O Dalchand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil S/O Shri Matadeen Vs State of Rajasthan

Arbaj @ Adil S/O Shri Hafeej Mohammad Vs State of Rajasthan

Rinku Meena S/O Shri Bhagwan Sahay Vs State of Rajasthan

Murli Manohar Naamdev S/O Shri Badri Lal Naama Vs State of Rajasthan

Suraj Mal S/O Rameshwar Vs State of Rajasthan

Sitaram S/O Bhogiram Vs State of Rajasthan