In this bail application, the High Court of Rajasthan granted bail to the petitioner accused of offences under the NDPS Act. The court considered the false implication, below commercial quantity, co-accused's bail, and the long pendency of the trial.
Petitioner released on bail in connection with FIR No.155/2023 upon executing personal bond with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 742/2024
Sahil S/o Sattar Ali, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Bhutto Ka Bas, Behind Masjid, Bikaner, Dist. Bikaner (Raj)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Varun Arora For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Solanki, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
24/01/2024
The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.155/2023 of Police Station Chatargarh, District Bikaner for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
[CRLMB-742/2024]
(2 of 2)
Police Station Chatargarh, District Bikaner provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
366-Bharti/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner accused of offences under the NDPS Act who was falsely implicated and is in judicial custody.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sahil S/o Sattar Ali
State Of Rajasthan
Madan Gopal Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
