The appellant in a civil first appeal failed to appear despite multiple notices. The court held that the appellant did not wish to prosecute the appeal and consequently dismissed it for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:3573]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 182/1996
State Of Rajasthan And Ors
----Appellant
Versus
M/s Vishwa Karma Laghu Udyog
----Respondent
| For Appellant(s) | : Nonepresent |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Amit Vyas for Mr. DD Thanvi |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Order
23/01/2024
Nobody has appeared on behalf of appellant even in the second round. Nobody appeared on behalf of the appellant on 01.11.2022 & 14.12.2023.
It appears that the appellant does not want to prosecute the present Civil First Appeal.
Accordingly, the Civil First Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J
4-neha/-
State Of Rajasthan And Ors
M/s Vishwa Karma Laghu Udyog
MADAN GOPAL VYAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
