Allowed

Giriraj Jangid S/O Ramdhan Jangid v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC27 Nov 2024CRLMB/7140/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application by an accused arrested in connection with FIR No.363/2023 involving cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy offences triable by a Magistrate. The court declined to comment on merits and granted bail considering the period already spent in custody.

What did the court decide?

Accused enlarged on bail on personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each to the satisfaction of the trial Judge.

Giriraj Jangid S/O Ramdhan Jangid Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:48709]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7140/2024

¶4

Giriraj Jangid S/o Ramdhan Jangid, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Makan No. 38 A, Heera Pura Dhabas, Police Station Karni Vihar, District Jaipur. (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Ms. Vandana Aoudichya
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP
For Complainant(s)	: Mr. Amit Saini

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

¶11

Order

¶12

27/11/2024

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.363/2023 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of IPC.

¶14

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The matter is triable by Magistrate and charge-sheet has already been produced before this Court. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 30.03.2024 and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accusedpetitioner may be allowed.

[2024:RJ-JP:48709]

[CRLMB-7140/2024]

(2 of 2)

Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for complainant vehemently oppose the bail application and contend that there are criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner and he was found involved in five cases of similar nature, therefore the bail application of the accused-petitioner deserves to be dismissed.

¶19

Heard and perused the material available on record.

¶20

It is not desirable to express anything on merits of this case and considering the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 30.03.2024 and the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Giriraj Jangid S/o Ramdhan Jangid in connection FIR No.363/2023 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South), shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

¶23

DEEPA RANI -135

Giriraj Jangid S/O Ramdhan Jangid v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Giriraj Jangid S/O Ramdhan Jangid v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jamshed S/O Yunus @ Lal Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Kedar S/O Shri Chhotu Vs State of Rajasthan

Dhannaram S/O Nathu Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Prakash Chand Vs State

Nimesh Rajora S/O Shri Harish Kumar Rajora Vs State of Rajasthan

Narsingh S/O Madan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan