Allowed

Ramkhiladi S/O Shri Shankarlal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Sept 2024CRLMB/7045/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order allowing regular bail in a vague criminal bail application based on overall circumstances without expressing opinion on merits. Petitioner filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for offences under IPC 457 and 380 at Jaipur City. Bond required with trial court sureties.

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioner released on bail with personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Ramkhiladi S/O Shri Shankarlal Meena Vs State of… — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:37797]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

7045/2024

¶5

Ramkhiladi S/o Shri Shankarlal Meena, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vilalge Kolya, Tehsil Uniyara, Police Stain Banaitha, District Tonk. At Present Tenant At Mangalram Ka Makan, Raj Nagar-A, Kankon Ki Dhani, Muhana, Police Station Muhana, Jaipur (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena, Adv. For : Mr. Devi Singh, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 06/09/2024

¶12

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.364/2024 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence(s) under Section(s) 457 & 380 IPC.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will

[2024:RJ-JP:37797]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-7045/2024]

take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Ramkhiladi S/o Shri Shankarlal Meena shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶22

DANISH USMANI /84

Ramkhiladi S/O Shri Shankarlal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramkhiladi S/O Shri Shankarlal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Farook Khan S/O Moh. Yakoob Vs State of Rajasthan

Pawan S/O Shri Mahendra Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunil S/O Satish Vs State of Rajasthan

Khaleel Khan S/O Kamru Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Natthuram @ Banti S/O Prakash Vs State of Rajasthan

Lahari Ram S/O Chimlaram Vs State of Rajasthan