Allowed

Sunil S/O Satish v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Sept 2024CRLMB/10794/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought regular bail in a criminal case involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Arms Act. The court, considering the petitioner's prolonged judicial custody and without expressing opinion on merits, allowed the bail application subject to furnishing personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Sunil S/O Satish Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:37383]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

10794/2024

¶5

Sunil S/o Satish, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Pragpura, P.s. Pragpura, District Kotuptli-Behrod (At Present Confined At District Jail Kotputli)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Dheeraj Jain, Adv., for Mr.
	Tarun Kumar Mishra, Adv.
For	: Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit,
Respondent(s)	P.P.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶12

05/09/2024

¶13

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.417/2024 registered at Police Station Pragpura, District Kotputli-Behror for the offence(s) under Section(s) 189(2), 115(2), 324(2), 119(1), 109(1) of BNS & 3/25 of Arms Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial

¶15

[2024:RJ-JP:37383]

¶16

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-10794/2024]

¶17

custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Sunil S/o Satish shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶22

YOGESH KUMAR /327

Sunil S/O Satish v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil S/O Satish v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Sampat Devi and Ors. Vs Sukharm and Ors.

Bunty Singh S/O Rajendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Punit Kapoor Vs Suresh Chand and Ors.

Vidhya Devi D/O Ram Prasad W/O Babulal Vs Subhash Chandra S/O Ram Prasad

Lokendra Singh Shekhawat S/O Dalip Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Monu @ Mohanlal S/O Rameshchand Vs State of Rajasthan