Allowed

Vasim S/O Sarfuddin v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Sept 2024CRLMB/6868/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the Rajasthan High Court granted regular bail to two accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The court accepted that the charge sheet was filed and the trial would take a long time, but did not express an opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail to furnish personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Vasim S/O Sarfuddin Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:37770]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

6868/2024

¶5

Vasim S/o Sarfuddin, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Luhinga Kalan, Tehsil Punhana, Police Station Punhana, District Nuh, Haryana. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶6

Sahun S/o Sarfuddin, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Luhinga Kalan, Tehsil Punhana, Police Station Punhana, District Nuh, Haryana. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Adv. For : Mr. Devi Singh, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 06/09/2024

¶11

This bail application has been filed by petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.173/2024 registered at Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Section(s) 147, 148, 149, 353, 307 & 120-B of IPC, under Section(s) 3/25(1a) & 3/25(6) of Arms Act, under Section(s) 5/8 of RBA Act & under Section(s) 16/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act.

¶12

Learned counsel for petitioners submits that accused-petitioners are innocent and they have been

[2024:RJ-JP:37770]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-6868/2024]

falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that charge sheet has been filed. He also submits that accused-petitioners have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶18

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that charge sheet has been filed, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge petitioners on bail.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioners 1.Vasim S/o Sarfuddin & 2.Sahun S/o Sarfuddin shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶21

DANISH USMANI /76

Vasim S/O Sarfuddin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vasim S/O Sarfuddin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Farook Khan S/O Moh. Yakoob Vs State of Rajasthan

Pawan S/O Shri Mahendra Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunil S/O Satish Vs State of Rajasthan

Khaleel Khan S/O Kamru Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Natthuram @ Banti S/O Prakash Vs State of Rajasthan

Lahari Ram S/O Chimlaram Vs State of Rajasthan