Allowed

Golu S/O Mahaveer v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC25 Jul 2024CRLMB/6706/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 439 CrPC for an accused in a murder case; complainant not an eyewitness, key witnesses' statements differ from earlier versions, no blood on the alleged torn pant, case differs from main accused. Bail granted with bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. one lakh plus two sureties of Rs. fifty thousand each and appearance on scheduled dates.

Golu S/O Mahaveer Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:31403]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

6706/2024

¶5

Golu S/o Mahaveer, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Chahicha, P.s. Dahikeda District Bundi, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined At District Jail Bundi).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sumati Bishnoi, Adv. For : Mr. Imran Khan, PP Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

25/07/2024

¶14

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk &nsbZ[ksMk] cwanh esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k &169@2022 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 147] 148] 149] 302] 379] 120ch Hkk-na-la- rFkk 3¼2½¼V½ ,l-lh-@,l-Vh- ,DV esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶15

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr us rdZ fn;k fd vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] mls feF;k :i ls fyIr fd;k x;k gS] og fnukad 05-01-2023 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA lHkh egRoiw.kZ xokgu ds c;ku gks pqds gSa] dfFkr izR;{kn'khZ xokg ih-MCyw&4 vt; rFkk

¶16

[2024:RJ-JP:31403]

¶17

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-6706/2024]

¶18

ih-MCyw&15 yksds'k us vfHk;qDr ds fo:) dksbZ lk{; ugha nh gS] vfHk;qDr ls dfFkr :i ls ?kVuk ds le; iguh gqbZ ,d isaV tCr dh x;h gS fdUrq ml ij jDr vkfn ds dksbZ fu'kku ugha gSa] mDr cjkenxh [kqys LFkku ls gqbZ gSA blh izdkj fuosnu fd;k fd eksVjlkbZfdy dh uEcj IysV dh dfFkr cjkenxh [kqys LFkku ls gqbZ gS] vfHk;qDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa uketn ugha gS] mldk ekeyk eq[; vfHk;qDr jkds'k ls fHkUu gS] vc rd tks lk{; ys[kc) gqbZ gS] mlesa vfHk;qDr ds fo:) dksbZ lk{; ugha vk;h gS] 'ks"k fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA lg&vfHk;qDr tqxy o uoy dh tekur blh U;k;ky; }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS ftuls orZeku vfHk;qDr dk ekeyk fHkUu ugha gSA blfy, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶19

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶20

nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶21

orZeku ekeys esa ifjoknh ?kVuk dk izR;{kn'khZ xokg ugha gS] dfFkr xokg ih-MCyw&4 o 15 dze'k% vt; o yksds'k ds iwoZorhZ dFku vUrxZr /kkjk 161 o 164 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds dFkuksa ls fHkUurk gSA orZeku vfHk;qDr }kjk e`rd dh gR;k dkfjr djrs le; muds }kjk ns[kk x;k gks] ,slh fLFkfr ugha gSA dfFkr :i ls tks isaV cjken gqbZ gS] ml ij dksbZ jDr ds fu'kku ugha gSaA orZeku vfHk;qDr dk ekeyk eq[; vfHk;qDr

¶22

[2024:RJ-JP:31403]

¶23

jkds'k ls fHkUu crk;k gS] izdj.k ds egRoiw.kZ xokgku ds c;ku gks pqds gSaA

¶24

vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶25

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr xksyw iq= egkohj dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A

¶26

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶27

Mittal /4

Golu S/O Mahaveer v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Golu S/O Mahaveer v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hemant Jain S/O Late Shree Gyan Chand Jain, Vs Ishwinder Singh S/O Shree Harwinder Singh

Ashok Chaturvedi S/O Vishanu Dutt Vs Tayyab Hussain S/O Islamuddin

Jubin Jain S/O Pradeep Jain Vs State of Rajasthan

Ram Niwas Mittal S/O Shri Vasudev Prasad, Vs Shri Abhishek Surana, Commissioner

Nemichand Alias Nemraj Vs Ramswaroop and Anr.

Mohan Singh S/O Pyare Singh Vs State of Rajasthan