In this civil miscellaneous appeal, the appellant was not present even in the second occasion. The single judge dismissed the appeal in default for default of appearance by the appellant.
Appeal dismissed in default for default of appearance by the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:31528]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 950/2017
Nemichand Alias Nemraj S/o Sukka, R/o Gehnoli, Tehsil Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur Raj.
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : None For : Mr. Surendar Meel, Adv. Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order
25/07/2024
No one was present on behalf of the appellant even in second round.
In view of above, the civil misc. appeal is dismissed in default.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DANISH USMANI /76
Nemichand Alias Nemraj S/o Sukka
Ramswaroop S/o Sonanda
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Sikar Dipot
UMA SHANKER VYAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
