Allowed

Lavkush @ Dharmendra S/O Soneram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Jul 2024CRLMB/8195/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Rajasthan High Court allowed a second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. Regular bail was granted subject to execution of a personal bond with two sureties, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on execution of personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Lavkush @ Dharmendra S/O Soneram Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:27805]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No.

¶4

8195/2024

¶5

Lavkush @ Dharmendra S/o Soneram, R/o Bharo Ka Pura, Moroli At Present Bichiya Ki Tek Thana Kotwali, District Dholpur. (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In District Jail Dholpur).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.R. Baisla, Adv. For : Mr. Bhawani Shankar Sharma, Respondent(s) P.P.

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 04/07/2024

¶12

This second bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.206/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali Dholpur, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Section(s) 399 & 402 IPC and under Section(s) 3/25(6) of Arms Act.

¶13

The first bail application of the accusedpetitioner was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 28.05.2024, giving liberty to the accused-petitioner to file afresh after filing of the charge sheet.

[CRLMB-8195/2024]

[2024:RJ-JP:27805]

(2 of 2)

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Lavkush @ Dharmendra S/o Soneram shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶22

DANISH USMANI /414

Lavkush @ Dharmendra S/O Soneram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lavkush @ Dharmendra S/O Soneram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hotel Gangaur (a Unit of Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation Limited) Vs Employee State Insurance Corporation

Deepak S/O Ramkhiladi Vs State of Rajasthan

Suresh Kumar Sharma Vs Pushpa Devi and Ors.

Hanuman Sahay Meena @ H.R. Meena S/O Shri Chhitarmal Vs State of Rajasthan

Suvalal Khinchi @ Tota @ Suaa S/O Manohar Lal Khatik Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra S/O Shri Devi Sahai Vs State of Rajasthan