Allowed

Tara Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Aug 2024CRLMB/6614/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yogendra Kumar Purohit, Jodhpur rejected the State's application for arrest of the petitioner under Section 20(a)(i) IPC. The court noted the petitioner has no prior criminal record and was already in judicial custody for a long duration without adequate reason.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed to the accused in BSN 2023 wherein the accused was shown relevant assets without specifying the amount.

Tara Ram Vs State of Rajasthan — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:33577]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6614/2024

¶4

Tara Ram S/o Sh Dhanna Ji, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Ranesh Ji, Police Station Bekariya, Distt Udaipur. ( At Present Lodged In Central Jail Udaipur)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	Deepak Menaria
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	S.K. Mehar,PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Order

¶11

13/08/2024

¶12

01izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls tekur dk ;g vkosnu i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk] iqfyl Fkkuk csdfj;k] ftyk mn;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 97@2024] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@20 ,u-Mh-ih-,l- ,DV ds ekeys esa tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk izLrqr gqvk gSA

¶13

02cgl tekur vkosnu lquh rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶14

03izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds ;ksX; vf/koDrk dh vksj ls ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ekeyk /kkjk 20(a)(i) ,u-Mh-ih-,l- ,DV dh Js.kh esa vkrk gSA ftlesa okf.kfT;d ek=k dk mYys[k ugha gSA /kkjk 37 ,u-Mh-ih-,l- ,DV ds izko/kku bl ekeys esa ykxw ugha gksrs gSaA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ esa dksbZ ,u-Mhih-,l- ,DV dk izdj.k yafcr ugha gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dkQh le; ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gSA izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶15

04blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us mDr tekur vkosnu i= dk l[r fojks/k djrs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds tekur vkosnu i= dks [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

[CRLMB-6614/2024]

[2024:RJ-JD:33577]

(2 of 2)

05eSaus mi;qZDr rdkZsa ij euu fd;k rFkk i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA bl ekeys esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ekeyk izFken`"V;k /kkjk 20(a)(i) ,u-Mhih-,l- ,DV dh Js.kh esa vkrk gSA ftlesa de ek=k] okf.kfT;d ek=k ds fy, vyx ls izko/kku ugha gSA ,slh voLFkk esa /kkjk 37 ,u-Mh-ih-,l- ,DV ykxw ugha gksrk gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ esa dksbZ ,u-Mh-ih-,l- ,DV dk ekeyk yafcr ugha gSA

¶20

06,slh voLFkk esa cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izdj.k ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶21

07ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk tekur vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr rkjkjke iq= /kUuk th] mi;qZDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds ekeys esa viuh fu;fer mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur izLrqr dj rLnhd djk ns rks mls bl izdj.k esa tekur ij rqjar fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶22

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶23

25-mayank/-

Tara Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tara Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rooplal Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish Rathore Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunder Lal Paliwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammed Asif Vs State of Rajasthan

Raju @ Rajendra Vs State of Rajasthan

Pintu Vs State of Rajasthan