Allowed

Pukhraj S/O Bhojaram Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Feb 2024CRLMB/628/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed bail applications filed by six accused-petitioners arrested under multiple IPC sections. The court held that since injuries to victims were simple in nature, it was just and proper to enlarge them on bail subject to bonds.

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioners enlarged on bail by furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Pukhraj S/O Bhojaram Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:6274]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 628/2024

¶4

Pukhraj S/o Bhojaram Gurjar, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Choraha Sathana, P.s. Bijaynagar, District Beawar. At Present In Central Jail Ajmer.

¶5

Kanaram S/o Bhojaram Gurjar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Choraha Sathana, P.s. Bijaynagar, District Beawar. At Present In Central Jail Ajmer.

¶6

Dilkush @ Mansukh S/o Babulal @ Nathu, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Gram Singawal, P.s. Bhinay, District Kekri. (At Present In Central Jail Ajmer).

¶7

Kalusingh Rawat S/o Gangaram Rawat, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Mataji Ka Kheda, Sathana, P.s. Bijaynagar, District Beawar. (At Present In Central Jail Ajmer).

¶8

Shivraj S/o Kalyan, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Hiyaliya, P.s. Bhinay, District Kekri. (At Present In Central Jail Ajmer).

¶9

----Petitioners

¶10

Versus

¶11

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶12

----Respondent

¶13

Connected With

¶14

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 977/2024 Duda Singh S/o Shir Mangla Rawat, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Kishana Ki Jhopariya, Sathana, Police Station Vijay Nagar, District Beawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined At Central-Jail, Ajmer)

¶15

----Petitioner

¶16

Versus

¶17

State Of Rajasthan, State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.

¶18

----Respondent

¶19

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Sharma Mr. Abdul Wahid Naqvi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan

¶20

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

[2024:RJ-JP:6274]

[CRLMB-628/2024]

(2 of 3)

Order

07/02/2024

The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 01/2024 registered at Police Station Bhinay, District Kekri for the offence(s) under Sections 143, 283, 332, 353, 436, 336, 458, 307 & 427 of IPC.

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the case. He further submits that the police officials were beaten. He also submits that the injuries sustained to Surendra Godara, Hariram & Pradeep were found to be simple in nature. After their medical examination, no case is made out under Section 307 of IPC against the petitioners. The petitioners Pukhraj, Kanaram, Dilkush @ Mansukh, Kalusingh Rawat and Shivraj are in judicial custody since 02.01.2024 and petitioner Duda Singh is in judicial custody since 06.01.2024 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the benefit of grant of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioners.

¶28

Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail applications.

¶29

Considered the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and looking to fact that the injuries sustained to the injured Surendra Godara, Hariram & Pradeep were found to be simple in nature, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

¶30

Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners Pukhraj

[2024:RJ-JP:6274]

[CRLMB-628/2024]

(3 of 3)

S/o Bhojaram Gurjar, Kanaram S/o Bhojaram Gurjar, Dilkush @ Mansukh S/o Babulal @ Nathu, Kalusingh Rawat S/o Gangaram Rawat, Shivraj S/o Kalyan and Duda Singh S/o Shir Mangla Rawat, in connection with FIR No. 01/2024 registered at Police Station Bhinay, District Kekri shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

¶35

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

¶36

60-61- Mohit

Pukhraj S/O Bhojaram Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pukhraj S/O Bhojaram Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shakeel Brothers Vs Firm Devendra Kumar Bhanu Kumar Proprietor Nand Kishor

Maroof Ahmed S/O Ayyub Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Banwari S/O Pratap Vs State of Rajasthan

Kaliya Vs State

Ramjan Ali S/O Kamru Khan Vs the State of Rajasthan

Duda Singh S/O Shir Mangla Rawat Vs State of Rajasthan