Allowed

Lalchand v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Feb 2024CRLMB/581/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court granted bail to eight accused persons lodged in Central Jail Bikaner, charging them under various sections of the IPC including Section 439. The bench held that the inquiry appearing to fail and delays necessitated releasing them.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners are granted bail and released on interim bail conditional upon furnishing security and appearing as and when required.

Lalchand Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:6409]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 581/2024

¶4

Lalchand S/o Mukhram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Jaswantsar P.S. Mahajan, District Bikaner (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Bikaner)

¶5

Bhagirath S/o Hanuman Ram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Jaswantsar P.S. Mahajan, District Bikaner (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Bikaner)

¶6

Kishanlal Alias Raju S/o Hanuman Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Jaswantsar P.S. Mahajan, District Bikaner (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Bikaner)

¶7

Babulal Alias Baburam S/o Mukhram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Jaswantsar P.S. Mahajan, District Bikaner (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Bikaner)

¶8

Khetpal S/o Bhanwarlal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Jaswantsar P.S. Mahajan, District Bikaner (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Bikaner)

¶9

Vinod S/o Jagdish, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Jaswantsar P.S. Mahajan, District Bikaner (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Bikaner)

¶10

Akbar S/o Hansraj, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Jaswantsar P.S. Mahajan, District Bikaner (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Bikaner)

¶11

Jagdish S/o Hanuman Ram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Jaswantsar P.S. Mahajan, District Bikaner (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Bikaner)

¶12

----Petitioners

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. R.S. Choudhary
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Vikram Sharma, P.P.
	Mr. Amardeep Lamba for
	complainant

(2 of 3)

[2024:RJ-JD:6409]

[CRLMB-581/2024]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS

¶21

Order

¶22

07/02/2024

¶23

izkFkhZx.k vfHk;qDrx.k ykypUn] HkkxhjFk] fd'kuyky mQZ jktw] ckcqyky mQZ ckcwjke] [ksriky] fouksn] vdcj o txnh'k dh vksj ls ;g tekur vkosnu /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk ds v/khu iqfyl Fkkuk egktu] ftyk chdkusj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 70@2023 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 341, 342, 323, 364, 365, 302 o 120B Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds ekeys esa izLrqr fd;k gSA

¶24

02eSaus ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k vfHk;qDrx.k] ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd o ;ksX; vf/koDrk ifjoknh dh cgl lquh ,oa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶25

03;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k vfHk;qDrx.k us rdZ fn, fd izkFkhZx.k vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gS vkSj mUgsa bl izdj.k esa feF;k :i ls fyIr fd;k x;k gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k ys[kc) l'kiFk dFkuksa esa erd ds firk ih-MCY;q-01 ckcw [kka] erd ds HkkbZ ih-MCY;q-02 odhy o ih-MCY;q-03 v;wc i{knzksgh ?kksf"kr gq, gSaA vU; lk{khx.k c`tyky ¼ih-MCY;q-04½] ifjoknh lqHkku [kka ¼ih-MCY;q-05½] y{ehukjk;.k ¼ih-MCY;q-06½ ,oa 'kh'kiky ¼ih-MCY;q-07½ Hkh U;k;ky; ds le{k i{knzksgh ?kksf"kr gq, gSaA izdj.k esa egRoiw.kZ lk{khx.k ds dFku ys[kc) gks pqds gSa vkSj fdlh Hkh lk{kh us vfHk;kstu dgkuh dk leFkZu ugha fd;k gSA izkFkhZx.k vfHk;qDrx.k dkQh le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA izdj.k ds fu"d"kZ esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA vr% ,slh ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa izkFkhZx.k vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶26

04blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k djrs gq, tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

[CRLMB-581/2024]

[2024:RJ-JD:6409]

(3 of 3)

tcfd ;ksX; vf/koDrk ifjoknh us izkFkhZx.k vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn, tkus ij vukifRr izdV dhA

¶31

05eSaus mi;qZDr ijLij fojks/kh rdksZa ij fopkj fd;kA izLrqr rdksaZ] vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh] izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa vkfn dks ns[krs gq,] bl izØe ij izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ foospu fd, fcuk izkFkhZx.k vfHk;qDrx.k ykypUn] HkkxhjFk] fd'kuyky mQZ jktw] ckcqyky mQZ ckcwjke] [ksriky] fouksn] vdcj o txnh'k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶32

06ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k vfHk;qDrx.k ykypUn iq= eq[kjke] HkkxhjFk iq= guqeku jke] fd'kuyky mQZ jktw iq= guqeku jke] ckcqyky mQZ ckcwjke iq= eq[kjke] [ksriky iq= Hkaojyky] fouksn iq= txnh'k] vdcj iq= galjkt] txnh'k iq= guqeku jke dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur dk izkFkZuk&i= vUrxZr /kkjk 439 naM izfØ;k lafgrk Lohdkj fd;k tkdj ;g vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izR;sd izkFkhZx.k vfHk;qDrx.k iqfyl Fkkuk egktu] ftyk chdkusj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 70@2023 esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa viuh fu;fer mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa ,d yk[k #i;s dk eqpydk ,oa fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn ipkl&ipkl gtkj #i;s dh nks lqn`<+ tekursa izLrqr dj rLnhd djk nas] rks mUgsa bl izdj.k esa tekur ij rqjar fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶33

(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J

¶34

143-Rajendra/-

Lalchand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalchand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ganpatram Vs State of Rajasthan

Pappu Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Pandir @ Pankaj Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaikam Vs State of Rajasthan

Prince Ojha @ Priyanshu Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan