Bail applications filed by accused persons in a cheating and criminal conspiracy case were allowed by the High Court. Despite opposition regarding prior cases, the court considered long custody and the triable nature of offences.
Bail granted to petitioners subject to furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:31611]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.5499/2024
Irsad S/o Asru, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Neemla, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg.
(At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg District Deeg).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5500/2024
Saikul S/o Juhru, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Nandera, Police Station Kaman, Presently Resident Of Neemla, Police Station Kathwada, District Deeg.
(At Present Petitioner Is Lodged In Sub Jail, Deeg)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5501/2024 1. Aazad S/o Khairati, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Neemla, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg.
(At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg).
(At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg).
(At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg).
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5765/2024
(2 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:31611]
[CRLMB-5499/2024]
Both are R/o Neemla, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioners Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg).
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar, Adv. Mr. Liyakat Khan, Adv. Mr. Aslam S. Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order
26/07/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:31611]
[CRLMB-5499/2024]
(3 of 3)
offences. It is also contended that the petitioners along with other co-accused in pretext of marriage of complainant-daughter, obtained huge amount from the complainant. After investigation, it was revealed that the other persons were also cheated by the petitioners by giving false commitments to the persons to marry their daughter's and have obtained huge amount from them, therefore considering the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the bail applications of the petitioners deserves to be dismissed.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-23-26
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused-petitioners should be granted bail in FIR No.29/2024?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Irsad S/o Asru
Saikul S/o Juhru
Aazad S/o Khairati
Nasru S/o Khairati
Sabbir S/o Samsu
Jaikam S/o Khairati
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
