Allowed

Mahmood Ali @ Sameer Gauri @ Babu v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC23 Jul 2024CRLMB/4191/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 439 CrPC for an accused in FIR 203/2023 involving charges of rape and related offences under the IPC and IT Act. The court noted the charge-sheet was filed, the accused had been in judicial custody since 19-02-2024, and granted bail on furnishing a personal bond of one lakh rupees with two sureties of fifty thousand each.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted; release on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 plus two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each before the trial court.

Mahmood Ali @ Sameer Gauri @ Babu Vs State of Rajasthan — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:29836]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4191/2024

¶4

Mahmood Ali @ Sameer Gauri @ Babu S/o Raseen Ahmad, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Gairsariya Ka Mohalla, Fad Bazaar, Bikaner, At Present Masjid Vali Gali, Lal Khan Ki Badi, Gali No. 02, Rampura Basti, Bikaner. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Bikaner).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. DS Thind
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Sharwan Bishnoi, PP with
	Mr. Prakash Panwar, GA
	Mr. shreedhar Purohit

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

¶11

Order

¶12

23/07/2024

¶13

01izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls tekur dk ;g vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk eqDrk izlkn uxj ftyk chdkusj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 203@2023] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 376] 384] 342] 366 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ,oa /kkjk 67] 67, lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh vf/kfu;e ds ekeys esa izLrqr gqvk gSA 02geus cgl tekur vkosnu lquh rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶14

03fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks >wBk Qalk;k x;k gSA bl ekeys esa /kkjk 164 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk ds c;kuksa esa ihfM+rk }kjk cykRdkj djus dk vkjksi ugha yxk;k x;k gSA bl ekeys esa vkjksi i= izLrqr fd;k tk pqdk gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnukad 19-02-2024 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gSA fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk gSA bu vk/kkjksa ij izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij fjgk fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶15

04blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;kA

(2 of 2)

[2024:RJ-JD:29836]

[CRLMB-4191/2024]

05tekur vkosnu ij euu fd;k] i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA vkjksi i= izLrqr fd;k tk pqdk gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnukad 19-02-2024 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gSA fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk ls budkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA

¶20

06cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, rFkk bl ekeys esa bl LVst ij /kkjk 164 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk ds c;ku dk voyksdu fd;k x;k ftldks ns[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk tqeZ dh izd`fr o ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶21

07ifj.kker% tekur vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns”k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr egewn vyh mQZ lehj xkSjh mQZ ckcq iq= jlhn vgen mi;qZDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds ekeys esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa viuh fu;fer mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur izLrqr dj rLnhd djk ns rks mls bl izdj.k esa tekur ij rqjar fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶22

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶23

4-SN LOHRA/-

Mahmood Ali @ Sameer Gauri @ Babu v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahmood Ali @ Sameer Gauri @ Babu v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sampat Raj Vs State of Rajasthan

Prabhudayal Vs State of Rajasthan

Durgsingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukandar Ali @ Mukesh Vs State of Rajasthan

Govindram Vs State of Rajasthan

Kishanlal Vs State of Rajasthan