Allowed

Sampat Raj v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC22 Jul 2024CRLMB/5366/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 403, 406, 467, 468, 471, and 120B IPC. The petitioner, who had been in judicial custody since April 2024 and was not accused of indiscipline, was directed to execute a personal bond and furnish two sureties. The court allowed the bail application under Section 439 CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on execution of personal bond and furnishing two sureties.

Sampat Raj Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JD:29573]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5366/2024

¶4

Sampat Raj S/o Bahadur Lal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Shobhavato Ki Dhani, Pal Road, P.s - Chopsani Housing Board, Jodhpur. (At Present Lodged In Dist. Jail, Jodhpur)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.Pawan Vishnoi
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Sharwan Bishnoi, PP with
	Mr. Avinash Godara
	Mr. SanjayGupta

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT

¶11

Order

¶12

22/07/2024

¶13

01izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls tekur dk ;g vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk izrkiuxj lnj ftyk tks/kiqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 146@2023] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 403] 406] 467] 468] 471] 120ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds ekeys esa izLrqr gqvk gSA

¶14

02geus cgl tekur vkosnu lquh rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶15

03fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks >wBk Qalk;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr }kjk fdlh izdkj dksbZ vkijkf/kd d`R; ugha fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls dksbZ cjkenxh ugha gqbZ gS vkSj u gh dksbZ cjkenxh gksuk 'ks"k gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnukad 08-04-2024 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gSA vUos"k.k o fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk gSA bu vk/kkjksa ij izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur ij fjgk fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA

¶16

04blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶17

05tekur vkosnu ij euu fd;k] i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fnukad 08-04-2024 ls U;kf;d vfHkj{kk esa gksuk crk;k gSA vuqla/kku

[2024:RJ-JD:29573]

[CRLMB-5366/2024]

(2 of 2)

iw.kZ gksdj urhtk is'k djus o ckn urhtk fopkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk ls budkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA

¶22

06cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk tqeZ dh izd`fr o ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶23

07ifj.kker% tekur vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns”k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr lEirjkt iq= cgknwjyky mi;qZDr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds ekeys esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa viuh fu;fer mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur izLrqr dj rLnhd djk ns rks mls bl izdj.k esa tekur ij rqjar fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶24

(YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J

¶25

9-S N LOHRA/-

Sampat Raj v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sampat Raj v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yaad Mohammad @ Chhotu Shekh Vs State of Rajasthan

Kashmir Mohammad Shekh Vs State of Rajasthan

Sahil Shekh Vs State of Rajasthan

Deep @ Gyani Vs State of Rajasthan

Prabhudayal Vs State of Rajasthan

Durgsingh Vs State of Rajasthan