High Court allowed second bail applications filed by three accused persons in a murder and affray case involving head injury, directing release on bond and surety despite prosecution objections based on neighborhood identification.
Petitioners released on bail with personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 3810/2024
Jagdish S/o Shri Badrilal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Natava, Police Station Hindoli, District Bundi Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Confined In District Jail, Bundi)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 4006/2024 Mukesh S/o Chhotulal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Natava, Police Station Hindoli, District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Bundi (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 4431/2024 Prithviraj @ Pritya S/o Shyojiram @ Sanwla, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Natawa District Hindoli District Bundi (Raj.). (At Present Accused Confined In Jail Bundi)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Tara Chand Sharma |
|---|---|
| Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain | |
| Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Suresh Kumar, PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
01/08/2024
[CRLMB-3810/2024]
(2 of 4)
(3 of 4) [CRLMB-3810/2024]
that if entire prosecution case is accepted even to be true then also, case would not travel to beyond Section 304 of IPC. They submit that co-accused Shivprakash has already been granted benefit of regular bail by this court. They further submit that the petitioners are in custody since 07.09.2023 and trial will take considerable time. Counsel contend that further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose.
(4 of 4)
[CRLMB-3810/2024]
dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
ANAND TANWAR /33-35
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused-petitioners are entitled to bail on second application after recording of prosecution witness testimony.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Jagdish S/o Shri Badrilal
Mukesh S/o Chhotulal
Prithviraj @ Pritya S/o Shyojiram @ Sanwla
State Of Rajasthan
Anil Kumar Upman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
