Allowed

Praveen S/O Sh. Omprakash v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Feb 2024CRLMB/400/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in an FIR for offences of hurt, wrongful restraint, robbery, kidnapping and extortion read with Section 34 IPC. The Court, without expressing any opinion on merits, allowed bail subject to furnishing a personal bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, to appear before the trial court on all hearing dates.

Praveen S/O Sh. Omprakash Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:5892]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

400/2024

¶5

Praveen S/o Sh. Omprakash, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Mohanpur, Police Station Nangal Choudhary, District Mahendragarh (Haryana). (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar).

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sikandar Singh Sakkarwal, Adv. For : Mr. Ghan Shyam Singh Respondent(s) Rathore, GA-cum-AAG

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 05/02/2024

¶12

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.552/2022 registered at Police Station Udhyog Nagar (Sikar), District Sikar for the offence(s) under Section(s) 323, 341, 394, 365 & 327 read with Section 34 of IPC.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will

[2024:RJ-JP:5892]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-400/2024]

take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Praveen S/o Sh. Omprakash shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶22

DANISH USMANI /43

Praveen S/O Sh. Omprakash v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Praveen S/O Sh. Omprakash v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saddam @ Bihari S/O Mahir Ali Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish Kumar S/O Kanaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Hemendra Singh Rajput S/O Birdhi Chand Rajput Vs State of Rajasthan

Mukandar Ali @ Bablu Khan S/O Shri Shamsherakhan Vs Union of India

Sandeep Singh @ Karan Singh S/O Shri Rajendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Jhabar Mal Gurjar S/O Rugnath Ram Vs Union of India