The High Court rejected the bail application of a petitioner accused under Section 376(2)(u) of the IPC. The court considered the gravity of the offense, the petitioner's lack of cooperation, and the stage of investigation. The application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:5544]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
613/2024
Hemendra Singh Rajput S/o Birdhi Chand Rajput, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Kanwarpura, Post Dattwas, Police Station Dattwas, District Tonk. At Present Tenant Flat No. D-1/02/09 Dwarkapuri Apartment, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur. (At Present Petitioner Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandra Shekhar, Adv. For : Mr. N S Gurjar, Assistant GA Respondent(s) Mr.Giradhari Lal Gupta, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
02/02/2024
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk izrkiuxj] t;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&1 242@23 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 376]¼2½¼,u½ Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA
izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vfHk;qDr funksZ"k gS] vf/kdre ekeyk vkilh lgefr dk gS] ihfMrk }kjk ncko cukus ds fy, feF;k vk/kkjksa ij izFke lwpuk
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-613/2024]
[2024:RJ-JP:5544]
ntZ djok;h x;h gS] izdj.k esa egRoiw.kZ vuqla/kku gks pqdk gS] izkFkhZ djhc ,d ekg ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkus ,oa mls tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA mUgksaus vius rdksZa ds leFkZu esa fuEu U;kf;d n`"Vkar izLrqr fd;s%&
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd o fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh us izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk fuosnu fd;k fd vfHk;qDr ds fo:) yxk;s x;s vkjksi vR;f/kd xaHkhj gS] vuqla/kku vHkh izkjafHkd voLFkk esa gS ] var esa vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;k ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA
vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ihfMrk ls fookg dh izoapuk dj djhc lkr o"kZ rd 'kkjhfjd laca/k cukus o nsg 'kks"k.k dk vkjksi gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk ihfMrk dk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd rRle; vfHk;qDr vfookfgr Fkk] vc og vU;= fookg djus gsrq rRij gS] vuqla/kku vHkh izkajfHkd voLFk esa gSA vfHk;qDr ds
fo:) yxk;s x;s vkjksi xaHkhj gSA izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa dk llEeku voyksdu fd;kA
izLrqr U;kf;d n`"Vkar rF;ksa dh fHkUurk ls gLrxr izdj.k ij ykxw ugha gksrs gSaA
izdj.k esa miyC/k leLr rF;kRed fLFkfr rFkk izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa o vijk/k dh XkaHkhjrk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds bl izdze ij xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr gsesUnz flag jktiwr iq= fcj/khpan jktiwr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Murari Lal Sharma /33
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a case registered under Section 376(2)(u) of the IPC?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Prakash Chand v. State of RajasthanReferred¶19
Prakash Chand v. State of Rajasthan 2017(3) MCY-L&J 405
Laxmi Dyal v. State of RajasthanReferred¶20
Laxmi Dyal v. State of Rajasthan 2021(1) SCC 83 · Who else cites this
Lalu v. State of RajasthanReferred¶22
Lalu v. State of Rajasthan 2021 SCC Online 1405 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Hemendra Singh Rajput
State Of Rajasthan
UMA SHANKER VYAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
