Allowed

Anil S/O Shri Matadeen v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC28 May 2024CRLMB/3801/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a bail application filed by an accused charged with offences under IPC and Arms Act. The court deemed it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail subject to furnishing a personal bond and sureties, without expressing an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each.

Anil S/O Shri Matadeen Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheque Dishonour | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:25393]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.

¶4

3801/2024

¶5

Anil S/o Shri Matadeen, R/o Samona, Police Station Rajakhera, District Dholpur. (Accused Petitioner Is Presently Confined At Distt. Jail Dholpur Raj.)

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Adv. For : Mr. C.G. Chopra, P.P. Respondent(s)

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶12

28/05/2024

¶13

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.55/2024 registered at Police Station Rajakhera, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Section(s) 332, 353, 307 & 34 IPC and under Section(s) 3/25 of Arms Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will

[2024:RJ-JP:25393]

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-3801/2024]

take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application.

¶20

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶21

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Anil S/o Shri Matadeen shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶23

DANISH USMANI /03

Anil S/O Shri Matadeen v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil S/O Shri Matadeen v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopal Lal Jat S/O Late Shri Jeevan Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Gopal Lal Jat S/O Late Shri Jeevan Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul S/O Kashiram Vs State of Rajasthan

Arbaj @ Adil S/O Shri Hafeej Mohammad Vs State of Rajasthan

Rinku Meena S/O Shri Bhagwan Sahay Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramdharam Meena S/O Nagaram Vs State of Rajasthan