Dismissed

Ravi Son of Prahlad v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Sept 2024CRLMB/3632/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous bail application, the High Court of Rajasthan rejected the application for the accused, who was found guilty of statutory rape involving a mentally retarded minor deemed incapable of consent, citing the absence of justifiable circumstances under relevant provisions.

What did the court decide?

The petition for bail was dismissed and the petitioner was directed to attend the victim in jail to avoid further delay.

Ravi Son of Prahlad Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:38834]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3632/2023

¶4

Ravi Son Of Prahlad, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Mothpur, Police Station Mothpur, District Baran (Raj.). (At Present In District Jail, Baran).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagdish Nagar For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K.Gupta, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶11

Order

¶12

12/09/2024

¶13

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g tekur izkFkZuk&i= varxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk vV: ftyk ckjka esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 83@2022 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 363] 376] 376¼2½¼,u½] 376¼3½ Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk o /kkjk 5¼,y½@6 ySafxd vijk/kksa ls ckydksa dk laj{k.k vf/kfue 2012 esa tekur dk ykHk fn, tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶14

cgl lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd mls izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ rFkk ihfM+rk ds xqe gksus dh fjiksVZ esa ihfM+rk dh eka us mldh mez 19 o"kZ gksuk vafdr djkbZ xbZ gSA ihfM+rk us vius /kkjk 164 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk ds varxZr ys[kc) fd, x, dFkuksa esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks igpkuuk] VsyhQksu ij ckr gksuk] mlls I;kj gksuk ,oa mlds lkFk viuh ethZ ls tkuk rFkk ethZ ls lkFk jguk ,oa tks Hkh lEcU/k cus os mldh lgefr ls cuuk izdV fd;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izdj.k esa fpfdRld MkWfjads'k eh.kk ih0M02 ds :i esa ijhf{kr gqvk gS ftlus vius dFkuksa esa ;g Li"Vr% izdV fd;k gS fd ihfM+rk ds 'kjhj ij dksbZ ckgjh ,oa vkarfjd pksV ugha FkhA ihfM + rk

[2024:RJ-JP:38834]

[CRLMB-3632/2023]

(2 of 3)

dh ekrk us vius dFkuksa esa ihfM+rk dh mez 19 o"kZ crkbZ gSA nLr;kch ds le; tks iqfyl flikgh Fkh mlus Hkh ihfM+rk dks lkM+h igus gq, ik;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izFke fo|ky; dk izek.k&i= dks izekf.kr djus ds fy, tks lk{kh xksfoUn dqekj jkor ih0M07 ds :i esa ijhf{kr gqvk gS mlus ;g izdV fd;k gS fd izos'k ds le; tks izi= Hkjk x;k mlds lkFk fdlh LFkkuh; fudk; ;k vLirky }kjk tkjh dksbZ tUe izek.k&i= ugha FkkA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd i{kdkjksa ds chp tks Hkh gqvk gS og lgefr ls gqvk gSA og fnukad 05-12-2022 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA mlds fo:) iwoZ dk dksbZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k lafLFkr ugha gSA fopkj.k esa le; yxsxkA vr% mls tekur ij eqDr fd;k tk,A

¶19

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd ihfM+rk ds Ldwy lEcU/kh nLrkostksa ds vuqlkj mldh tUefrfFk 08-07-2008 gS] ftlds vuqlkj ?kVuk dh fnukad dks og 13 o"kZ 6 ekg dh Fkh] ftldh lgefr dk dksbZ egRo ugha gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd ihfM+rk us vius dFkuksa esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds lkFk 'kkjhfjd lEcU/k cukuk Lo;a izdV fd;k gSA xEHkhj izd`fr dk vijk/k gSA vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk ugha fn;k tk,A

¶20

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u

¶21

fd;k x;kA

¶22

i=koyh ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo:) /kkjk 363] 376] 376¼2½¼,u½] 376¼3½ Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk o /kkjk 5¼,y½@6 ySafxd vijk/kksa ls ckydksa dk laj{k.k vf/kfue 2012 ds vijk/k ds vfHk;ksx gSaA fopkj.k ds nkSjku xokg xksfoan dqekj jkor ds dFku ih0M07 ds :i esa ys[kc) fd, x, gSa] ftlus ihfM+rk dh tUe frfFk fo|ky; vfHkys[k ds vuqlkj 08-07-2008 crkbZ gS] ftlds vuqlkj ?kVuk dh fnukad dks ihfM+rk dh mez 13 o"kZ 06 ekg ds yxHkx FkhA mlds }kjk vius U;k;ky; dFkuksa esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr }kjk mlds lkFk 'kkjhfjd lEcU/k cukuk izdV fd;k x;k gS] ijUrq ihfM+rk vo;Ld Fkh] ftldh lgefr dk fof/k esa dksbZ egRo ugha gSA bl Lrj ij lk{; dk lw{e foospu fd;k tkuk u rks okafNr gS] u gh mfpr gSA vr% izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjLFkfr;ksa esa ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, fcuk] vijk/k dh xEHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq,

[2024:RJ-JP:38834]

[CRLMB-3632/2023]

(3 of 3)

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk&i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶27

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr jfo iq= izgykn dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur dk ;g izkFkZuk&i= vLohdkj dj fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶28

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶29

AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /02

Ravi Son of Prahlad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Son of Prahlad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra Meena S/O Nathuram Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Krishnakant @ Krishna @ Kk S/O Shri Kanhiya Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Bajrang Prasad Gupta Vs State

Aadil S/O Shri Mohammed Rafiq Vs State of Rajasthan

Dr. Rahul Kansal S/O Sunil Kumar Kansal Vs Union of India

Bhoor Singh @ Golu @ B S S/O Rohtash Vs State of Rajasthan