Dismissed

Krishnakant @ Krishna @ Kk S/O Shri Kanhiya Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC11 Sept 2024CRLMB/11129/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan rejected bail applications for two petitioners involved in a conjugal violence case. The Court held that prior to previous two bail applications, relief cannot be granted, and the plea under Section 483 Indian Evidence Act 1872 regarding lack of witnesses does not override procedure requirements.

What did the court decide?

Bail applications rejected; petitioners to appear as per prior orders; bail not granted immediately.

Krishnakant @ Krishna @ Kk S/O Shri Kanhiya Lal Vs State… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:38648]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9866/2024

¶4

Avinash Kumar @ Avinash Tomar @ Golu S/o Jagdish, R/o Thara (Bal Kaa Pura), Police Station Ambah, District Morena (Madhya Pradesh) Presently Confined In District Jail Dholpur.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11129/2024 Krishnakant @ Krishna @ Kk S/o Shri Kanhiya Lal, R/o Patpara, Rahlai, Police Station Iradat Nagar, District Agra U.p. (Accused Is Presently Confined In Jc At District Jail- Dholpur).

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dheeraj Singhal Mr. Manoj Kumar Awasthi For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R.Dhakad, PP

¶16

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶17

Order

¶18

11/09/2024

¶19

izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 483 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds vUrxZr viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;s nks iFkd&iFkd izkFkZuk&i= iqfyl Fkkuk jktk[ksM+k ftyk /kkSyiqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 222@2024 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 109] 190] ¼191½] 331¼7½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk 2023 esa tekur dk ykHk fn, tkus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is”k fd, x, gSaA

¶20

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ gS fd mUgas izdj.k esa fdlh jaft'k ds dkj.k feF;k Qalk;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd vfHk;qDrx.k i<+us

[2024:RJ-JP:38648]

[CRLMB-9866/2024]

(2 of 3)

okys fo|kFkhZ gSaA mudk rdZ gS fd ekSds ij isapdl feyuk crk;k x;k gS] ,slk isapdl fdlh Hkh O;fDr ds ikl gks ldrk gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dk okjnkr djus ds ckn lM + d ij Hkkxuk crk;k gS ijUrq ikl gh cSad esa lhlhVhoh dSejk yxs gq, gSa vkSj ,sls fdlh lhlhVhoh dSejs dh dksbZ QqVst is'k ugha dh xbZ gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ d`".kdkar ds fo:) iwoZ dk dksbZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ ugha gSA og ckjgoha d{kk mRrh.kZ gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ vfouk'k ds fo:) iwoZ ds nks vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ gSaA vfHk;qDrx.k fnukad 15-07-2024 ls vfHkj{kk esa gSaA vkjksi&i= is'k gks pqdk gS] izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa le; yxxskA vr% mUgsa tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk,A

¶25

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k@ vfHk;qDrx.k us jkf= esa njokts dh tkyh rksM+dj ?kj esa izos'k fd;k ,oa ifjoknh ds lkFk cSYV ls mldk xyk nckus dk iz;kl fd;kA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vfouk'k ds vkf/kiR; ls lfj;k cjken fd;k x;k gS vkSj ekSds ls eksVjlkbZfdy ,oa isapdl Hkh cjken gq, gSaA mudk rdZ gS fd izdj.k esa vU; vfHk;qDrx.k vHkh fxj¶rkj ugha gq, gSaA mudk rdZ gS fd i{kdkjksa ds e/; jaft'k lEcU/kh rdZ lgh ugha gS D;ksafd izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k vkxjk] mRrjizns'k ds rFkk ifjoknh jktk[ksM+k jktLFkku dk fuoklh gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vfouk'k ds fo:) iwoZ ds nks vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ gSa ftuesa ,d izdj.k /kkjk 392 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds xEHkhj vijk/k dk gSA vr% izkFkhZx.k dks tekur dk ykHk ugha fn;k tk,A

¶26

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ij euu fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u

¶27

fd;k x;kA

¶28

i=koyh ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ij vU; rhu vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk feydj ifjoknh ds njokts dh tkyh dkVdj dejs esa izos'k ij mldk xyk lkQh o cSYV ls nckus dk iz;kl djus dk vkjksi gSA izdj.k esa vHkh vU; vfHk;qDrx.k dks fxj¶rkj fd;k tkuk ckdh gSA vuqla/kku iwjk ugha gqvk gSA izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vfouk'k ij iwoZ ds nks vkijkf/kd izdj.k e/; izns'k esa ntZ gSa ,oa orZeku ?kVuk jktLFkku dh gSA vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) vHkh rd ds vuqla/kku ls 109] 190] 191¼2½] 331¼7½] 61¼2½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk ds xEHkhj izd`fr

[2024:RJ-JP:38648]

[CRLMB-9866/2024]

(3 of 3)

ds vijk/k ds vfHk;ksx gSaA vr% izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa bl izØe ij tcfd vuqla/kku 'ks"k gS rFkk 'ks"k vfHk;qDrx.k dks fxj¶rkj fd;k tkuk ckdh gS] xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, fcuk izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶33

ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur ds ;s nksuksa izkFkZuk&i= vLohdkj dj fujLr fd, tkrs gSaA

¶34

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶35

AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL /113-114

Krishnakant @ Krishna @ Kk S/O Shri Kanhiya Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishnakant @ Krishna @ Kk S/O Shri Kanhiya Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Fareed S/O Shri Abdul Rehman Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhagwandas S/O Madanlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sameer Khan Son of Mausam Vs State of Rajasthan

Dharmendra S/O Bheemsingh Vs State of Rajasthan

Shekh Sharif S/O Shekh Chhotu Vs State of Rajasthan

Sumer S/O Yogendra Vs State of Rajasthan