Dismissed
Arjun v. State of Rajasthan
Rajasthan HCCRLMB/317/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This order records that the petitioners did not wish to press their bail applications, resulting in dismissal as not pressed, with liberty to renew later.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
[2024:RJ-JD:5573]
¶2
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
¶3
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 317/2024
¶4
- Arjun S/o Peeta Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Bavli Ps Kalandri District Sirohi Rajasthan (At Present Lodged At District Sirohi)
¶5
- Hakma Ram S/o Nava Ram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bavli Ps Kalandri District Sirohi Rajasthan (At Present Lodged At District Sirohi)
¶6
----Petitioners
¶7
Versus
¶8
- State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Asha S/o Pira Ram, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Bavli Ps Kalandri District Sirohi Rajasthan
¶9
----Respondents
¶10
Connected With
¶11
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15303/2023 Hakma Ram S/o Nawa Ram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bavali, Kalandri P.s. Tehsil And Dist. Sirohi (Confined In Dist. Jail, Sirohi)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Arjun S/o Peeta Ram
- petitioner
Hakma Ram S/o Nava Ram
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
- respondent
Asha S/o Pira Ram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/317/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court