Petitioner absent in two rounds; factual report showed PC Act offences proved after investigation, sanction issued and charge-sheet filed. Court found no force in petition alleging colourable exercise of power and illegal gratification demand, and dismissed the petition along with stay petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:5407]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 27/2023
Nain Singh Sodha S/o Sh. Kishan Singh, Aged About 59 Years, H.no.11/145 Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur, P.s. Vidhyadhar Nagar, Dist. Jaipur. At Present R/o Ii/2 Civil Lines, Rajsamand And Posted As Dist. Transport Officer, Rajsamand (Raj.).
----Petitioner
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : None Present |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. M.A. Siddiqui, GA-cum-AAG |
| assisted byMr. Rohit Mutha |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
01/02/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JD:5407]
[CRLMP-27/2023]
out. There are allegations of colourable exercise of power and demand of illegal gratification. The active participation and involvement of the petitioner can be seen from the evidence collected so far by the agency. In this view of the matter, there is no force in the petition and deserves to be dismissed.
(FARJAND ALI),J
150-divya/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal miscellaneous petition seeking relief against the corruption proceedings against the petitioner should be allowed, given investigation findings and issued sanction.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nain Singh Sodha
State Of Rajasthan
Nirmal Kumar Sen
Farjand Ali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
